SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(All) 70

B.DAYAL, R.S.PATHAK
RAM BABU – Appellant
Versus
PERSHADI LAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.N.SETH, SWAMI DAYAL

PATHAK, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a defendants second appeal arising out of a suit for recovery of arrears of rent and mesne profits and for ejectment.

( 2 ) THE facts briefly are that the defendant was a tenant of the plaintiff, that the tenancy commenced on the 17th of each English calendar month, that the plaintiff obtained a decree for arrears of rent for the period ending February 16, 1959 that in May 1959 the defendant remitted a sum of Rs. 77/- by money order to the plaintiff intending the amount to cover the rent due under the decree and also of the period ending May 16, 1959. It appears that this money order was refused by the plaintiff. Subsequently he served a notice on July 13, 1959 upon the defendant demanding arrears of rent due for the entire period ending June 16, 1959. There is no dispute that no payment was made by the defendant consequent to this notice.

( 3 ) WHEN this case was heard by our brother Gupta it was contended that the rent having been tendered by money order, it must be considered that the defendant had paid the rent, and, therefore, there were no arrears of rent due for the period up to May 16, 1959 and, accordingly when the notice was served upon the defend






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top