SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(All) 34

M. C. DESAI, K. B. ASTHANA
COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX – Appellant
Versus
HAJI ABDUL MAJID, SONS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.P.Pandey, K.C.Agarwala

K. B. ASTHANA, J.

( 1 ) IN this reference under Section 11 of the U. P. Sales Tax Act at the instance of the commissioner of Sales Tax, U. P. , the following question has been referred for decision by the high Court: whether in the circumstances of this case the entire cost of the ready-made bodies of the buses is liable to tax under the U. P. Sales Tax Act or only the cost of materials used in the manufacture thereof would be taxable.

( 2 ) M/s. Haji Abdul Majid and Sons (hereinafter referred to as the assessee) carry on the business of constructing bus bodies on the chassis supplied by the customers in the town of Meerut. For the year 1950-51 the Sales Tax Officer assessed the assessee on a total turnover of Rs. 82,800 in respect of thirty-six bodies on an average value of Rs. 2,300 each. It appears that due to certain reasons the assessee could not file an appeal against the assessment order in time and applied in revision before the learned Judge (Revisions) who by his order dated 23rd June, 1955, reduced the taxable turnover to Rs. 62,100 making an allowance of a sum of Rs. 20,700 as the labour charges involved in constructing the bus bodies. The learned Judge (Revisions) foun
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top