SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(All) 123

V.G.OAK
RAM SINGH – Appellant
Versus
BOARD OF REVENUE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Surendra Narain Singh

V. G. OAK, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ petition arises out of a suit for partition under Section 176 of Act No, 1 of 1951.

( 2 ) THE parties to the suit were related to one another as shown in the pedigree given in the affidavit. Bachchan Singh had five sons Including Ram Baran Singh, Deo Singh and Samoo. Ram Baran Singhs wife was Smt. Rukmina. Deo Singhs daughter was Smt. Lachi. Her sons are dashrath and others. Samoos sons are Sharda, Rama and Markandey. Dashrath and others filed the suit for partition against Sharda and others claiming 2/5th Share in the holding. According to the plaintiffs, Smt. Rukmina died before Deo Singh. The plaintiffs claim was resisted by the defendants. In the first place, it was denied that Smt. Rukmina is dead. In the alternative, it was suggested that she might have died after Deo Singhs death. The trial Court held that Smt. Rukmina is dead, and that she died during Deo Singhs lifetime. The plaintiffs claim was, therefore, decreed. Successive appeals by the defendants were dismissed by the Additional commissioner, Varanasi and the Board of Ravenu. Hence this writ petition by Rama Singh defendant.

( 3 ) THE decision of the case turned on the questions whether






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top