SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(All) 97

MITHAN LAL
LACHHIMI NATH PATHAK – Appellant
Versus
BHOLANATH PATHAK – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.P.Pandey, G.N.KUNZRU

MITHAN LAL, J.


( 1 ) THIS second appeal filed by two of the defendants is directed against the judgment of Hari Har sharan, Civil Judge, Allahabad, reversing the decree of the trial Court and decreeing the plaintiffs suit.

( 2 ) THE dispute related to a piece of land which was said to be part of No. 192 and which was in the form of an akhara. The plaintiff alleged that he had been in adverse proprietary possession of this land for more than twelve years but defendants Nos. 2 to 5 in collusion with defendant No. 1 started proceedings under Section 145, Cri. P. C. and obtained delivery of possession from the court of the Magistrate. The plaintiff alleged that neither defendant No. 1 not any other defendant remained in possession of the land in dispute and consequently the present suit was filed for a mere declaration and injunction restraining the defendants not to take possession over the land in dispute. The relief for possession is conspicuously absent from the plaint.

( 3 ) THE defence was that the land in dispute was not part of No. 192 and that the plaintiff had nothing to do with the land in dispute. It was said to belong to one Shiv Sahai alias Sahai who was the predecessor o

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top