SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(All) 214

H.C.P.TRIPATHI
GOPAL KRISHNA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.M.Chaturvedi, P.C.Chaturvedi, S.B.JAUHARI

H. C. P. TRIPATHI, J.

( 1 ) APPELLANT Gopal Krishna has filed this appeal against his convictions under Section 161 I. P. C. and under Section 5 (1) (d) read with Section 5 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act recorded by the Special Judge, Aligarh. Appellant has been sentenced to one years rigorous imprisonment for each of the two offences, and, both the sentences have been directed to run concurrently.

( 2 ) IN May 1961 the appellant and one Mangal Sen were posted as Marketing Inspector and senior Marketing Inspector respectively at Aligarh and in their capacity as such public servants, they used to check the accounts or stocks of the licencees of foodgrains for ensuring the proper observance of the provisions of the U. P. Foodgrains Dealers Licencing Order, 1959. Both of them were prosecuted for having committed offences under Section 161 I. P. C. and the appellant was also charged under Section 5 (i) (d) read with Section 5 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption act (Act II of 1947) while Mangal Sen was further charged under Section 165-A, I. P. C. and were tried together by the learned Special Judge of Aligarh who gave benefit of doubt to Mangal sen but convicted the appellant



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top