SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(All) 15

S.S.DHAVAN
SHEO BARAN – Appellant
Versus
BINDESHWARI PRASHAD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mohd.Ayub

S. S. DHAVAN, J.


( 1 ) THIS is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India impugning the legality of an order passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Tanda allowing the election petition under Section 12 (c) of the U. P. Panchayat Raj Act. In 1961 there was an election held for the office of the pradhan of the Gaon Sabha, Baskhari in the District of Faizabad. The petitioner Sheo Baran was not a candidate but only a voter. The rival candidates were the first and the second respondents bindeshwari Prasad and Dudhnath. Bindeshwari Prasad was elected. Dudhnath filed a petition challenging the election of the winner on the ground that he was holding an office of profit under the Government at, the tune of his nomination and, therefore, disqualified for election. Dudhnath prayed that the election of Bindeshwari Prasad be set aside, and further that he be elected as the sole candidate after the rejection of Bindeshwari Prasads nomination papers. Bindeshwari Prasad contested the petition and filed a written objection in which he denied that he held any office of profit under the Government. In his evidence before the tribunal, he admitted that he was employed as a temporary mat








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top