B.DAYAL, S.D.SINGH
A. J. FARIDI – Appellant
Versus
CHAIRMAN, U. P. LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL (R. V. DHULEKAR), LUCKNOW – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS petition under Article 226 of the Con-stitution has been filed by Dr. A. J. Faridi, who was a Member of the U. P. Legislative Council. The three opposite parties in the petitions are Sri raghunath Vinayak Dhulekar, Chairman, U. P. Legislative Council, the Secretary of the U. P. Legislative Council and the U. P. Legislative Council itself.
( 2 ) ON nth February, 1960, Dr. Faridi and eight other members of the Council gave notice of the following resolution :
"sri Raghunath Vinayak Dhulekar, being unfit for the office of the Chairman of the Council, should be removed from the office"
under Rule 143 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business of the Council. Under this rule a resolution for the removal of the Chairman can be moved only if the leave of the House is given for the purpose by 20 members of the House rising in support of the same when so required by the Chairman to do. The question relating to the leave was included as item No. 3 in the agenda for and March, 1960.
( 3 ) ON 2nd March, 1960, Sri Raghunath Vinayak Dhulekar (to be referred to hereafter as Sri dhulekar), the Chairman of the Council, was occupying the chair. After the first two ite
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.