K.B.ASTHANA, B.MUKERJI
HAZI RAHMETULLA – Appellant
Versus
CHAUDHARI VIDYA BHUSAN – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS Civil Revision has been referred to a Bench by a learned Single Judge. The order of the learned Single Judge indicates that he has made the reference to a larger Bench for the disposal of the revision, even though he has formulated three points which, in his view, merited consideration for the purposes of the determination of the revision on the merits.
( 2 ) THE three questions which the learned Single judge formulated were, to quote his words:-"
1. Whether in a case, where a party files the award along with his application, it can make an application under Section 17 of Arbitration Act for making the award a rule of the Court, without making a prayer for the filing of the award as required by Section 14 (2) of the Arbitration Act?
2. Whether Article 178 of the Limitation Act applies to? such a case?
( 3 ) IF it does, whether in the present case the flung of the petition in the Court of the Munsif amounted to prosecuting a remedy with due diligence under Section 14 ot the Indian Limitation act and the period should have been condoned under Section 14 of the Indian Limitation Act?" 3. In order to appreciate the points which the learned Single Judge stated, it is
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.