SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(All) 117

A.P.SRIVASTAVA, K.B.ASTHANA
JAN MOHAMMAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.N.Mulla

SRIVASTAVA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal by Jan Mohammad who has been convicted under Sections 302 and 307, i. P. C. by the Civil and Sessions Judge of Mirzapur. For the former offence he has been sentenced to death and for the latter to undergo seven years rigorous imprisonment. The usual reference under Section 374 of the Cri. P. C. for the confirmation of the death sentence is also before us.

( 2 ) LEARNED counsel for the appellant did not question before us the correctness of the conviction of the appellant for both the offences. He also did not challenge the main findings recorded by the learned Sessions Judge against he appellant. On a perusal of the record the conviction appears to be perfectly justified. Though an attempt was made at the trial Court to make some of the witnesses to go back on their earlier statements, there can be no doubt that the Sessions Judge was right in his findings that on the 1st May 1961 at about 8 a. m. the appellant Jan Mohammad went to the house of Arshuddin Khan deceased. Smt. Nazbeen, the daughter of the deceased, was also there at the house. There was some talk between the appellant and the deceased. The appellant then struck the deceased with

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top