SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(All) 188

B.DAYAL, J.N.TAKRU
SARSHWATI BAI – Appellant
Versus
ALLAHABAD BANK LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
V.P.MISRA

B. DAYAL, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application under Article 227 of the Constitution which has been referred to a division Bench by a learned single Judge of this Court because he was of the opinion that the decision in Civil Misc. Writ No. 1247 of 1956, D/- 1-10-1958, (All), Vinayakdatt Tewari v. Shom Nath Pathak, did not lay down good law. That being the decision of a learned single Judge it was thought proper to refer the matter to a Division Bench.

( 2 ) THE facts which have given rise to this application are very short. The respondent Allahabad bank Ltd. filed a suit in the Court of the Civil Judge Kanpur which came up for hearing before the II Addl. Civil Judge, Kanpur. This was suit No. 136 of 1960. The plaint in the case was written in English language. The defendant filed an application before the Court praying that english not being the language of the court under R. 15 of the General Rules (Civil), the plaint was liable to be rejected. This application was dismissed by the Court below relying upon the decision of a Division Bench of this Court in Mohd. azim Uddin v. State of Uttar Pradesh, 1959 all LJ 863 : (AIR 1959 All 459 ). The defendant then moved this application under



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top