SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(All) 179

J.N.TAKRU, B.DAYAL
BHUKAN LAL – Appellant
Versus
ISHWAR DAYAL SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMBIKA PRASAD, N.S.SINGHAL

TAKRU, J.


( 1 ) THIS revision by the decree-holder under Section 115 C. P. C. is directed against a judgment and decree of tha learned Civil Judge, Moradabad, whereby he upheld in appeal, a judgment and decree of a learned Munsif of that place, dismissing the execution application filed by the applicant.

( 2 ) IT appears that the applicant obtained a money decree against the opposite party from the court of the Judge, Small Causes. He got that decree transferred to the Court of Munsif, as he wanted to realise his amount by the attachment and sale of the opposite-partys immovable property, and some immovable property of the latter was also attached. Thereupon the judgment-debtor filed objections, inter alia, on the ground that having regard to the amended provisions of Section 42 C. P. C. the learned Munsif did not have the power to attach immovable "property for execution of the decree of the Court of judga Small Causes. The objection found favour with the Executing Court and the execution application was struck off. The applicant went "up in appeal to the lower appellate Court and the latter holding itself bound by the decision in Karam Chand v. Gur Dayal, 1960 All LJ 352 : (AIR 1











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top