SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(All) 170

B.MUKERJI, D.P.UNIYAL
OM PRAKASH – Appellant
Versus
MAYA RAM – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Raja Ram Agarwal, SHANTI BHUSHAN

UNIYAL, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal by Om Prakash, plaintiff against the appellate order of the Additional Civile judge, Muzaffarnagar returning the plaint for presentation to the proper Court.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff filed a suit in the Court of the Munsif for dissolution of a partnership firm and for accounts on the allegation that the said firm came into existence on 31-10-1953 and carried on its business till 16-11. 1955. It was alleged that the defend-dants dissolved the said firm on 16-11-1955 without his knowledge or consent. In para. 5 of the plaint it was asserted that the plaintiff made a capital investment of Rs. 22,000/- in the partnership business which was going on well till it was dissolved, and that he owed a sum of Rs. 4,383-4-9 only to the partnership in respect of the accounts of an old firm. In para. 7 o the plaint it was pleaded that it was not possible of the plaintiff to ascertain the exact amount due to him from the firm and he was, therefore, valuing the suit at Rs. 1,000/- for the purpose of jurisdiction and the payment of court-fees.

( 3 ) THE defendants admitted that the plaintiff was" a partner in the firm but denied that he had made any investment. It was a













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top