SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(All) 197

D.S.MATHUR
AVINASH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


D. S. MATHUR, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a Criminal Reference by the Additional Sessions Judge of Muzaffarnagar with the recommendation that the order dated 26-6-1962 of the Magistrate be set aside and he be directed to furnish copies of the statements of witnesses recorded under Section 161 Cr. P. C. to the accused person.

( 2 ) CHAMANLAL Nagpal made a report with the police of district Saharanpur alleging that the applicant, Srimati Avinash Kaur had committed offences punishable under Sections 406 and 409, I. P. C. The offences were investigated by the police but no chargesheet was submitted. Thereafter Chamanlal Nagpal moved a criminal complaint before the Magistrate at Saharanpur which has since been transferred to Muzaffarnagar. The complaint is at present pending for hearing before Sri P. C. Misra, Magistrate, 1st Class, Muzaffarnagar.

( 3 ) SRIMATI Avinash Kaur wanted to utilise the statement recorded by the police under S. 161, Gr. P. C. for cross-examining the complainant and his witnesses and with that aim. in view moved an application for the summoning of the case diary pertaining to this csse. The case diary was not received on the date the criminal case was taken up. She natural



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top