SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(All) 27

M.C.DESAI
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Appellant
Versus
SUDARSHAN DEO – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.C.KHARE


( 1 ) THIS was a special appeal by the State of Uttar Pradesh and the Director of Education, Uttar pradesh, against an order of Nigam, J. of the Allahabad High Court allowing the writ petition of sri Sudarshan Deo, under Article 226 of the Constitution, praying for the issue of a writ of mandamus directing the appellants to fix his seniority in the graded list of special Subordinate educational Service, U. P. , on the basis of the original date of this substantive appointment in that cadre, that is from March I, 1941. The appeal was heard by a Division Bench, consisting of r. Dayal and B. Upadhya, JJ. The Honble Judges having differed in their opinions they referred two questions to a third Judge for his opinion. Thus, the matter came before M. C. Desai, J. who delivered the following opinion : desai, J. The following two questions have been referred for my opinion :

"1. Whether, in the circumstances of the case, this Court should issue a writ under Article 226 of the Constitution directing the appellants to fix the seniority of Sri Sudarshan Deo, in his service and grade, as determined by the Court?

( 2 ) WHETHER the respondents seniority in the Special Subordinate Service, U. P. ,


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top