SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(All) 19

M.C.DESAI, S.N.DWIVEDI, B.MUKERJI
PARAS RAM – Appellant
Versus
JANKI BAI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Satyendra Nath Verma

M. C. DESAI, AG. C. J.

( 1 ) THE question referred to us in this appeal is whether the appeal lies to this Court or to the court of the District Judge, Kanpur.

( 2 ) THE material facts arc as follows : A petition under Section 10 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, was filed by the appellant, the husband, against the respondent his wife, in the Court of the district Judge, Kanpur, who transferred it for disposal to the First Civil Judge, Kanpur. No valuation was given on the petition at all. An application for relief under Section 24 of the Act was made before the learned Civil Judge by the wife and ho passed the order under appeal to the effect that further proceeding on the appellants petition would remain stayed so long as he did not pay to the wife the sum of Rs. 250/- for her cost of defending the proceeding as ordered on the 7th April, 1958. The appellant, being aggrieved by the order, preferred this appeal to this Court. The appeal was valued in the memorandum of appeal at Rs. 250/-, The memorandum of appeal was presented before S. N. Sahaj, J. who admitted the appeal, ordered a notice of it to be issued to the respondent, and referred the appeal to a larger Bench for decision












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top