SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(All) 62

D.S.MATHUR
BHUMARG YATAYAT – Appellant
Versus
THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.D.Pant, S.N.KACKAR

D. S. MATHUR, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a petition under Article 228 of the Constitution of India by Messrs. Bhumarg Yatayat (Registered), 431, Khatikan, Muzaffarnagar, through Uma Sharan (to be referred herein after us the petitioner), for the issue of a writ of certiorari or a like writ or direction to quash the resolution dated! the 6th/7th April, 1960, and also for the issue of a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents, namely, the Regional Transport Authority, Meerut, and the Secretary of the regional Transport Authority Meerut, to forbear from giving effect to the said impugned resolution.

( 2 ) THE facts of the case are not in controversy. What the respondents have pleaded in the counter-affidavit is to justify their action.

( 3 ) THE admitted facts of the present case are that Muzaffarnagar-Rohana-Charthawal route, about 15 miles long, was declared a B-class route under the U. P. Motor Vehicles Taxation Rules, 1935, and in the beginning applications for permanent permits were invited and later for temporary permits; but no final orders were passed and in the end under resolution No. 49 dated the 6th/7th April, 1960, the Regional Transport Authority, Meerut, respondent No. 1, amal












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top