SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(All) 60

D.P.UNIYAL, T.RAMABHADRAN
SADHU SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.D.GUPTA, B.N.Katju, Devendra Bahri, G.N.Verma, S.R.Diwedi, T.RATHORE

UNIYAL, J.

( 1 ) THE applicants were tried for the offence of murder by the Sessions Judge, Naini Tal, and were convicted under Section 302 I. P. C. by an order dated 10-4-60. Sadhu Singh was sentenced to death while the remaining applicants were sentenced to imprisonment for life. Their appeal was dismissed by the High Court on 12-7-60 which confirmed the death sentence passed on Sadhu singh, The applicants then applied for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court but the same was dismissed by the High Court on 11-8-60. Thereafter they moved the Supreme Court by means of a petition for special leave to appeal but it was also rejected by an order dated 13-10-60.

( 2 ) THE applicants have now applied to this Court tinder Section 561-A Cr. P. C. for review of the appellate order of the High Court dated 12-7-60 on the allegation that the site plan prepared by the investigating officer and relied upon at the trial was a forged document and that perjured evidence had been produced by the prosecution in support of its case. This Court is, therefore, asked to summon fresh evidence and to re-examine the case in, the light of new facts brought to its notice.

( 3 ) A preliminary objection has be





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top