SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(All) 98

D.P.UNIYAL, KAILASH PRASAD
OM PRAKASH – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.P.AGRAWAL, S.C.Asthna

KAILASH PRASAD, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a petition for revision by Om Prakash

( 2 ) OM Prakash resides within the jurisdiction of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Pilibhit. Srimati ram Dulari, alleging herself to be the wife of Om Prakash, filed a case Under Section 488 criminal Procedure Code. Sri R. S. Agarwal, Sub-divisional Magistrate, Bisalpur ordered notice to be issued to Om Prakash. On receipt of this notice Om Prakash raised an objection to the effect that the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Bisalpur had no jurisdiction to take proceedings against him under Section 488 Cri. P. C. , as Om Prakash was not residing within his jurisdiction. The objection was disallowed by the Magistrate.

( 3 ) AGAINST the order of the magistrate, Om Prakash filed a revision before the Sessions judge of pilibhit. The learned Sessions Judge held that proceedings under Section 488 Cri. P. C. can be taken against any person in any district where he resides or last resided with his wife. He accordingly rejected the revision,

( 4 ) OM Prakash then filed the present revision application in this Court. It came up for hearing before a learned Single Judge. In view of the conflict between the decisions in the case of k














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top