SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(All) 72

T.RAMABHADRAN, D.P.UNIYAL
KHALIL AHMAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Bashir Ahmed, HARISH CHANDRA PATI TRIPATHI, K.L.MISHRA, M.M.Chaturvedi

D. P. UNIYAL, J.

( 1 ) THE following questions have been referred to us for decision : (1) Whether the question of citizenship can be decided by the Central Government or by the law courts ? (2) What is the effect of clause (iii) of Schedule III of the Citizenship Rules of 1956? (3) Does a person contravene Section 14 of the Foreigners Act if he does not obtain a permit and stays in India beyond the date mentioned in the visa?

( 2 ) THE above reference; has arisen out of a revision petition filed by Khalil Ahmad against his conviction and sentence under Section 14 of the Foreigners Act, 1946. The applicant was born in india of Indian parents who were domiciled in the country. He left India for Pakistan in March, 1950 after the Constitution had come into force. Thereafter he arrived in India under a Pakistani passport No. 09531 dated 9-1-1953 bearing Indian, visa No. 546 of Category c dated 3-1-1957 issued by the Indian High Commissioner in Pakistan at Karachi. The visa was valid up till the 25th April, 1957. The applicant entered India on the 25th January 1957 on the basis of the passport and the visa mentioned above. He, however, did not obtain any permit from the civil authorities



















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top