SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(All) 119

B.L.GUPTA
RAM KISHAN SUNDER LAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.SARUP

BRIJLAL GUPTA, J.


( 1 ) THIS is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution.

( 2 ) THE main point raised in this petition is a challenge to the validity of the U. P. Sales Tax (Validation) Act (XV of 1958) which validated the notification ST 905/x dated 31st March, 1956, issued under the authority of Section 3-A of the U. P. Sales Tax Act, by reason of which the petitioner was assessed to sales tax by the order impugned in this writ petition. The validity of the Act has been put beyond doubt by the decision of the Supreme Court in J. K. Jute Mills Co. Ltd. v. State of U. P. and Anr. [1961] 12 S. T. C. 429. In view of this decision the learned counsel is not in a position to press the main point.

( 3 ) A subsidiary point taken by him is that as mentioned in grounds Nos. (vii), (xi) and (xii) of the grounds of the petition. This point has been urged by him somewhat as follows :-By reason of sub-section (3) of Section 14 of the Indian Coinage Act, 1906, as amended by the Indian coinage (Amendment) Act, 1955, the rate of sales tax, which is expressed as one anna per rupee in the notification, should be construed as being expressed in terms of nay a Paisa. According to the lea













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top