SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(All) 118

N.U.BEG
KEDAR NATH – Appellant
Versus
CHANDRA KIRAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
JAGNANDANLAL JAGDISH SVARUP, SHANTI BHUSHAN

N. U. BEG, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application under Order 23 Rule 1, Sub-rule (1), C. P. C. given by the plaintiffs appellants in Second Appeal No. 1757 of 1959 for permission to withdraw the suit filed by them against the defendants-respondents. It is argued on behalf of the applicants that they have an absolute right to withdraw the suit at any stage they like under Order 23, Rule 1, Sub-rule (1) C. P. C. On the other hand on behalf of the opposite parties it is argued that the plaintiffs have no such right at any rate, at this stage. The lower court has given a finding of fact in favour of the defendants-respondents after an elaborate discussion of the evidence produced in the case. This finding is final and binding in second appeal. By allowing permission to withdraw the suit the court will be depriving the defendants of the benefit of the finding of the lower court in their favour. The case has crossed the stage of suit and is now at the stage of second appeal. The defendants-respondents have incurred heavy expenses in fighting out this case. It would not be in the interests of justice to deprive them of the benefit of the plea of res judicata by allowing the plaintiffs appellant




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top