SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(All) 110

B.N.NIGAM, A.N.MULLA, R.A.MISRA
HANIF – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.N.HATWAL, IQBAL AHMED

R. A. MISRA, J.


( 1 ) THIS appeal has been preferred by 12 persons, namely, Hanif, Salim, Suleman, Mohd. Ilyas, ghulam Dastgir son of Nankau, Mohi-uddin, Sarfaraz, Ashiq Ali, Sadiq Ali, Ghulam Dastgir son of Mohd. Ismail, Qasim and Wali Mohammad against their conviction and sentence imposed upon them by the learned Sessions Judge, Bara-banki. All the appellants have been sentenced to imprisonment for life under Section 302 read with 149, I. P. C. In addition, Hanif has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for two years under Section 148, I. P. C. , and the remaining appellants have been sentenced to one years rigorous imprisonment each, under Section 147, I. P. C. The sentences in the case of each appellant have been made concurrent.

( 2 ) THE charge against the appellants was that on 17th April, 1960, at about 1. 30 p. m. in village shahabpur. district Barabanki, they formed an unlawful assembly armed with a bhala and lathis and in prosecution of the common object of the unlawful assembly they committed the murder of one Darshan deceased.

( 3 ) THE appeal was heard by a Bench constituted of Mulla and Nigam, JJ, Both the learned Judges delivered their judgments separately. While

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top