W.BROOME
ASHA RAM – Appellant
Versus
G. C. SAXENA – Respondent
( 1 ) IN this reference the Civil and Sessions Judge of Rampur recommends the quashing of proceedings pending against the applicant, Sub-Inspector Asa Ram, in the court of the City magistrate of Rampur under Section 29 of the Police Act.
( 2 ) THE allegations against the applicant are that while posted as Station Officer of Tanda Police station he refused to record a report that a certain Rahim Bux wished to lodge about a burglary committed in his shop in the month of December 1955, and similarly while posted as Station officer of Suar Police Station he refused to record a report of one Gokul Haldia regarding a burglary committed in his house during the month of September 1957. On complaints being made by Rahim Bux and Gokul departmental proceedings were started against the applicant under Section 7 of the Police Act, and on the conclusion of that inquiry he was called upon to show cause why he should not be punished. But instead of submitting a proper reply to this notice the applicant tiled complaints under Section 500, I. P. C. against Rahim Bux and Gokul in the court of the Judicial Officer (1), Rampur, on 31-1-1959. On this the Superintendent of Police of Rampur
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.