B.MUKERJI, S.C.MANCHANDA
GHULAM HAQQANI KHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent
( 1 ) I have had the advantage of reading my brothers opinion and I may, with respect, say that I am in general agreement with his opinion. I agree that this appeal must fail and that the parties should bear their own costs of the appeal.
( 2 ) SINCE the appeal raised some interesting questions for determination I thought it desirable to, very briefly, indicate my own views on some of the questions falling for determination.
( 3 ) THE facts and the important controversies arising on those facts have been fully set out in my learned, brothers judgment and hence I content myself with dealing specifically with only two questions; first, whether the Board of High School and Intermediate Education which was established by the Intermediate Education, Act, 1921 (U. P. Act II of 1921) was a corporate body with all the privileges and liabilities of such a body, or whether the Board of High. School and intermediate Education was merely a statutory body with no different existence from being a department of Government; and secondly, whether the appellant, even if he could be treated as an employee of a body which had been created under a statute necessarily, lost the character of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.