SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(All) 67

V.BHARGAVA, B.UPADHYA
ZAFAR UDDIN AHMAD – Appellant
Versus
L. MADAN MOHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Brij Lal Gupta, G.Kumar

V. BHARGAVA, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision application is directed against an order of the learned Judge, Small Cause Court. Moradabad, dismissing an application for setting aside an ex parte decree. The ex parte decree in question was passed by that Court on 2-6-1953. On 6-7-1953, the defendant applicant moved an application for a direction from the Court permitting him to furnish security through a personal surety bond for the entire decretal amount. At the same time, he presented an application for setting aside the ex parte decree supported by an affidavit as also a personal surety bond for the entire decretal amount. On 9-7-1953, the Court made an order "allowed" on the application of the applicant to permit him to furnish security in the form of a personal surety bond. On the 14th of July, the applicant deposited Rs. 9/- and odd in cash in the court apprehending that the surety bond furnished by him may not be considered as covering the entire decretal amount which was in excess of Rs. 1000/- to that extent After that deposit, the security furnished was verified and was finally accepted by the court. Subsequently, the plaintiff-opposite party objected to the maintainability of the a








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top