SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(All) 86

B.R.JAMES, J.N.TAKRU
MOOLA SINGH – Appellant
Versus
SURENDRA SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.S.SINGHAL, P.C.Chaturvedi, Satishchandra Asthana

J. N. TAKRU, J.


( 1 ) THIS is a complainants appeal, by special leave, against an appellate order of acquittal passed by the First Assistant Sessions Judge of Saharanpur. The circumstances under which it arises are as follows : Mula Singh, the appellant, filed a com- plaint against Surendra Singh, Bhopal Singh, bhagwan Singh and Harbhan Singh, the respondents, alleging that on the evening of the 22nd august 1958 the latter demolished the Gul (water-course) of Kulaba No. 7 Canal Minor Nalhera which passed through their plot No. 265 in village Chapperh and irrigated the appellants field and they thus committed an offence punishable under Section 70 (1) of the Northern India Canal and Drainage Act (Act No. VIII of 1873), hereinafter referred to as the Act.

( 2 ) ALL the respondents denied the appellants case and attributed their false implication to enmity on account of some election disputes. They examined three witnesses in their defence.

( 3 ) THE trial court on an appraisal of the evidence led by the parties found the appellants case proved and consequently convicted and sentenced each of the respondents to a fine of Rs. 45 in default to one weeks rigorous imprisonment. On appeal


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top