R.N.GURTU, S.N.DWIVEDI
RAM NARAIN – Appellant
Versus
JAI NARAIN – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is an appeal by the defendant in a suit under Section 14 of the Religious Endowments Act xx of 1863. The plaintiff in the suit was In the line of the founders of the endowment in favour of the temple of Sri Mahadevji and Hanuman. It was alleged in the plaint that the properties, detailed in the foot thereof and comprising -- (1) a Dharamshala and temple of Mahadevji and hanumanji and a well including a Sahdari and garden, (2) one Nohra including Khatties, two shops now converted into two garages, and one house, (3) Rs. 15,385/4/- standing in the Khata of the Dharamshala on the 16th of August, 1932 and (4) other articles belonging to the dharamshala such as utensils, beds, carpets etc. , -- were dedicated to the said temple in Sambat 1953, but as there was no formal deed, disputes relating to the said endowment were referred to arbitration on the 20th of August 1933 when a scheme for the management and upkeep of the deities and its properties was settled by the Arbitrators. Under the said scheme, the plaintiff was appointed the President of the endowment and defendant No. (1) was appointed its Secretary and defendant No. (2) was appointed as its Trustee. The def
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.