SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(All) 78

R.N.GURTU, S.N.DWIVEDI
RAM NARAIN – Appellant
Versus
JAI NARAIN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.P.GAUTAM, H.Swarup, J.Swarup, M.L.CHATURVEDI, S.B.L.GAUR

GURTU, J.


( 1 ) THIS is an appeal by the defendant in a suit under Section 14 of the Religious Endowments Act xx of 1863. The plaintiff in the suit was In the line of the founders of the endowment in favour of the temple of Sri Mahadevji and Hanuman. It was alleged in the plaint that the properties, detailed in the foot thereof and comprising -- (1) a Dharamshala and temple of Mahadevji and hanumanji and a well including a Sahdari and garden, (2) one Nohra including Khatties, two shops now converted into two garages, and one house, (3) Rs. 15,385/4/- standing in the Khata of the Dharamshala on the 16th of August, 1932 and (4) other articles belonging to the dharamshala such as utensils, beds, carpets etc. , -- were dedicated to the said temple in Sambat 1953, but as there was no formal deed, disputes relating to the said endowment were referred to arbitration on the 20th of August 1933 when a scheme for the management and upkeep of the deities and its properties was settled by the Arbitrators. Under the said scheme, the plaintiff was appointed the President of the endowment and defendant No. (1) was appointed its Secretary and defendant No. (2) was appointed as its Trustee. The def





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top