SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(All) 124

V.D.BHARGAVA, J.N.TAKRU
MUNICIPAL BOARD, SAMBHAL – Appellant
Versus
JHAMMAN LAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMICUS CURIAE, IQBAL AHMED, K.C.SAXENA, P.C.Chaturvedi


V. D. BHARGAVA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal against acquittal in a case under Section 7/16 (b) of the Prevention of Food adulteration Act.

( 2 ) THE Food Inspector reached the shop of Jhamman Lal on 26-2-1958 at about 2 p. m. There were four drums of sarson oil at the shop and also mungphali oil which was exposed for sale. He asked Jhamman Lal, respondent No. 1 to give; him a sample of mustard oil. But Jhamman, Lal instead of complying with the request, of the Food, Inspector left the shop and promised to come shortly. The Food Inspector waited for some time, but Jhamman Lal did not turn up. Tota Ram, who appears to have been also sitting on the shop was then asked by the Food Inspector to supply the sample. He said that sample could only be given by Jhamman Lal and that he was going to call Jhamman Lal. He also left the shop. The Food Inspector waited for an hour and a half, but neither Tota Ram nor Jhamman Lal came: back. The Food Inspector had gone with witnesses Bhola (P. W. 3), Ram Samp, Rafi Uddin (P. W. 2) and Mohammad Ismail (P. W. 4 ). He thereafter made a report against Jhamman Lal that Jhamman Lal prevented the Food inspector from obtaining sample from him and Tota Ram ha

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top