SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(All) 231

J.K.TANDON
RAM ASREY – Appellant
Versus
RAMESHWAR PRASAD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.K.DHAON, J.S.TRIVEDI, Jagdish Narain, M.K.SETH, Ratana Dei

J. K. TANDON, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application by one Ram Asrey appellant for review of my order dated the 23rd august, 1960: It may be of use to mention a few facts.


( 2 ) A suit for partition, was commenced by Rameshwar Prasad claiming a third share in certain properties including a house which had been purchased by Rani Asrey applicant. One of the questions before the court below was as regards the legality of the sale deed in favour of Ram asrey. One allegation was that the same had been procured through exercise of fraud and misrepresentation. The trial Court accepted this contention and held against Ram Asrey in the matter of purchase of the house by him. Ram Asrey not satisfied with that judgment has come up in appeal. One of the points which thus presented itself for decision was about the effective nature of the sale deed in favour of Rani Asrey.

( 3 ) WHILE the appeal was pending the appellant,. e. Ram Asrey and respondent Rameshwar prasad settled their differences and presented a compromise here on the 15th of April, 1960. In presenting this compromise it also was asked that the dispute between the appellant and the first respondent might be decided in terms of the compro










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top