V.G.OAK, S.S.DHAVAN
MAHMOOD – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
( 1 ) I agree with my learned brother that Mahmoods conviction under Section 302,. P. C. should be upheld, but Ms sentence should be reduced to imprisonment for life- I would like to add a few words to explain the proper approach in cases of homicide committed under provocation.
( 2 ) IN order to bring his case under Exception 1 to Section 300. P. C. , an accused has to establish the following ingredients :
(i) The provocation was sudden; (ii) the provocation was grave; and (iii) loss of self control these three ingredients may be considered one by one. (i): Whether the provocation was sudden or not does not present much difficulty. The word sudden involves two elements. Firstly, the provocation must be unexpected. If an accused plans in advance to receive a provocation in order to justify the subsequent homicide, the provocation cannot be said to be sudden. Secondly, the inter val between the provocation and the homicide should he brief. If the man giving the provoca- tion is killed within a minute after the provocation, it is a case of sudden provocation. If the man is killed six hours after the provocation, it is not a case of sudden provocation.
(ii) The main difficulty
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.