SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(All) 2

B.R.JAMES, RAGHUBAR DAYAL
SARWAT YAR KHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
MUKHTAR AHMED

RAGHUBAR DAYAL, J.

( 1 ) SARWAT Yar Khan filed an application under Section 20 of the Indian Arbitration Act on the 16th oi August 1954 before the District Judge of Kumaur. alleging that on the 8th of May 1949 the Deputy Commissioner Nainital abruptly cancelled the lease executed by the latter in favour of the appellant on the 7th of July 1945 and took possession of the land along with the houses built by the appellant and the groves and other trees that stood on the land. He also alleged that according to the terms of the lease he was entitled to compensation. He represented to the respondents about his claim for compensation and when they paid no heed to his request he made the aforesaid application praying that the agreement of reference to arbitration contained in the lease deed be filed and a reference be made to the Board of Revenue for determining fhe amount of compensation to which the appellant was entitled.

( 2 ) THE opposite parties contested the application. They accepted the allegations of the appellant and further stated that they had given 250 acres of land in village Aimnaganj to the appellant in compensation for the land resumed and that the appellant had accepted














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top