SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(All) 1

R.N.GURTU, D.N.ROY
LADLI BEGUM – Appellant
Versus
SUNDER LAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.B.ASTHANA, N.P.ASTHANA, W.A.KHAN

GURTU, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a mortgagors appeal in a suit for sale on foot of a mortgage deed executed by the mortgagors-defendants in favour of the plaintiffs-mortgagees on the 1st of October, 1928, for a sum of Rs. 15,000.

( 2 ) IN their plaint the mortgagees have set out the particulars of the mortgage and have shown that amount of mortgage money was Rs. 15,000/-, It is alleged in the plaint that out of the mortgage consideration Rs. 11,500, were left for payment to Lala Ramchander, but out of that Rs. 11,500/-only a sum of Rs. 11,346/4/- was paid and Rs. 40/-was spent in the execution and completion of the acquittance. In this way Rs. 11,386/4/- were paid and the amount which was actually paid has been included in the account. The rest of the mortgage consideration, according to the mortgage deed, was made up in such a way that Rs. 1875/- were paid before the sub-Registrar, Rs. 1200/- was in respect of other debts and Rs. 1500/-was taken for redeeming some ornaments which had been pledged.

( 3 ) DEFENCE was entered and the plea was taken that undue advantage was taken of the straitened circumstances of the contesting defendants and they were therefore compelled to agree to usurious













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top