SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(All) 215

A.N.MULLA
RAM NARAIN – Appellant
Versus
MOOL CHAND – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.N.CHAUDHURY

A. N. MULLA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a reference made by the Additional District Magistrate (Judicial), Rae Bareli, recommending that the order of dismissal dated the 4th of October, 1958, passed by a sub-divisional Magistrate in a complaint case be set aside.

( 2 ) THE facts of the case which led to this reference are as follows : one Ram Narain filed a complaint in the court of the Sub-divisional Magistrate, Dalmau, Raa bareli, against the five opposite parties alleging that they had contravened the provisions of the child Marriage Restraint Act. It was alleged that Ram Kumar, opposite party No. 4, who is the son of Kali Babu, opposite party No. 2, was married to Shrimati Rajeshwari alias Gogee, opposite party No. 5, who is the daughter of Mool Chand, opposite party No. 1. It was further alleged in this complaint that both Shrimati Rajeshwari and Ram Kumar were about 14 years of age at the time of marriage and the remaining three opposite parties celebrated this marriage in contravention of the provisions of the Child Marriage Restraint Act. The complaint was filed in the month of June 1958 and the opposite parties were served on the 12th of September, 1958. The next hearing fixed in th






























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top