SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(All) 160

A.P.SRIVASTAVA
PT. SIDH NATH SHUKLA – Appellant
Versus
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK OF INDIA LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.C.SAKSENA, T.N.SAPRU


A. P. SRIVASTAVA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a plaintiffs appeal that arises out of a suit to recover Rs. 6,300/- from the defendant.

( 2 ) ON the 10th of September 1947 the plaintiff paid in the sum of Rs. 6,000/- to the defendant bank at its Nayaganj Branch in the city of Kanpur for the preparation of a draft in the name of one Dr. Ram Narain of Lucknow, A draft bearing No. 56/47 was prepared for Rs. 6,000/- and was handed over to the plaintiff. The plaintiff retained the draft with himself and did not hand it over to Sri Ram Narain. He informed the defendant that the draft should be cancelled and the money paid back to him. He also offered to furnish an indemnity bond for the amount though he contended that it was not necessary. The defendant bank, however, refused to pay the amount to the plaintiff. The plaintiff therefore sought to recover Rs. 6,000/- the amount originally deposited by him for the purchase of the draft and Rs. 300/- interest thereon at the rate of six per cent, per annum. The total amount claimed was thus Rs. 6,300/ -.

( 3 ) THE suit was contested by the defendant who admitted that the plaintiff had paid in Rs. 6,000/for the purchase of the draft and that the draft havi

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top