SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(All) 148

N.BEG, V.D.BHARGAVA
STATE – Appellant
Versus
KAMLESH HARI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.K.SINGHAL

V. D. BHAKGAVA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court under Article 134 (1) (c) of the constitution against our judgment by which we had dismissed the appeal of the State against the acquittal of the opposite parties, Kamlesh Hari and Kunwar Singh.

( 2 ) KUNWAR Singh, Suresh and Kamlesh Hari were prosecuted inter alia, under Sections 120-B and 396 I. P. C. arid under Section 302 I. P. C. for having criminally conspired with two other persons, namely, Prakash and Imam Ali deceased to commit the offence of theft by house breaking; to commit dacoity with murder of Ganga Saran and obtaining the key of Pyarey Lals house from Ganga Saran at the Kothri of Khan; and to commit abduction of Ganga Saran for murdering him and for having committed the dacoity along with Prakash and Khan on the 29th of November, 1956, by taking the key, wrist watch and gold ring from Ganga Saran in the Kothri of Khan and in the commission of that dacoity committed the murder of Ganga Saran.

( 3 ) KUNWAR Singh and Suresh were further charged under Section 363 read with Section 109 I. F. G. and Sections 407 and 307 read with Section 114 I. P. C. for abetting Kamlesh Hari, and pra



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top