AGARWALA
KARIM BUX – Appellant
Versus
REX – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is an application in revision by Karim Bux, a police constable of Fatehpur, who has been convicted Under Section 164, Penal Code, and sentenced to one years rigorous imprisonment and Rs. 100/- as fine by the Sessions Judge of Fatehpur hearing an appeal against the applicants conviction by a Magistrate not only Under Section 161 but also Under Section 384, Penal Code. The conviction Under Section 384, Penal Code, was set aside.
( 2 ) THE only point for consideration before me is whether there was a sanction to prosecute the applicant or not. The sanction to prosecute is required by Section 6 of Act II [2] of 1947 which runs as follows: section 6.-- "no Court shall take cognizance of an offence punishable Under Section 161 or section 165, Penal Code, or under Sub-section (2) of Section 5 of this Act, alleged to have been committed by a public servant, except with the previous sanction, (a ). . . . . . . . (b) in the case of a person who is employed in connection with the affairs of a Province and is not removable from his office save by or with the sanction of the Provincial Government or some higher authority, Provincial Government; (c) in the case of any oth
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.