SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(All) 12

WANCHOO
NARMADA PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
REX – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Amarnath Kaul, D.P.UMYAL, G.N.KUNZRU, N.N.MUKHARJI, R.N.Basu, S.C.KHARE

WANCHOO, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a revision by Sardar Narmada Prasad Singh in connection with a searth which took place at his house on 27th october 1949.


( 2 ) THE facts are that the District Magistrate of Rewa, Vindhya Pradesh, issued a search warrant under s. 96, Criminal P. C. This warrant was endorsed by the Regional Commissioner of Vindhya pradesh. It was brought to the District Magistrate of Allahabad who, in his turn endorsed it forwardint the same to the Senior Superintendent of police, Allahabad. The warrant was for the search of the premises of the aplicant in connection with an alleged offence under s. 409, Penal code, committed by him in Vindhya Pradesh. Thereupon, the house of the applicant was searched in the presence of a magistrate of Allahabad, a deputy Superintendent of Police of these provinces and the Superintendent of Police of Vindhya Pradesh and certain documents belonging to the applicant were seized and handed over to the Superintendent of Police, Rewa. These documents have been taken to Rewa.

( 3 ) THE contention, on behalf of the applicant, is that the search warrant issued by the District magistrate of Rewa could not be served in Allahabad and the District Mag










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top