SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(All) 9

MUSHTAQ AHMAD
KAILASH PAT – Appellant
Versus
GOSWAMI BRIJ GOPAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
GOPAL BEHARI, M.L.CHATURVEDI, R.N.Gurtu

MUSHTAK AHMAD, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a defendants appeal in a suit for cancellation of a lease dated 8th May 1911, granted by one Lalta Prasad to the defendant-appellant. There was also a relief for possession.

( 2 ) THE lease covered two plots, forming part of Khewat No. 26/1 of mahal Kalan Bangar in bindraban, district Mathura, and it was for building purposes. Rs. 1,000 were paid under the lease as premium, and an annual rent of Rs. 10 was made payable by the lessee.

( 3 ) THE plaintiff, a co-sharer in the plots, brought the suit for cancellation of the lease on the ground that Lalta Prasad, another co-sharer, had no right to grant it without the consent or authority of the remaining co-sharers. It is admitted that there are about seventy co-sharers, out of whom twenty-nine appear to have attested the deed of lease. It was the defendants case that twenty, one out of the remaining co-sharers had received portions of the amount of the premium paid by the lessee.

( 4 ) THE plaintiff had brought the suit as a representative suit under Order 1, Rule 8, Civil P. C. , taking the necessary permission from the Court in that behalf. A number of pleas were taken in defence, but I am concerned o










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top