SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(All) 130

RAGHUBAR DAYAL
ABDUL AZIZ – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.Sanyal

RAGHUBAR DAYAL, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application by Abdul Aziz praying for the transfer of a case under Section 323, penal Code, pending against him in the Court of Bench Magistrates, Hapur, to some other Court having jurisdiction to try the same or for the passing of such order as may be considered expedient. The application is described as one under Section 526, Criminal P. C. , read with article 227, Constitution of India.

( 2 ) UNDER Section 52, U. P. Panchayat Raj Act XXVI [26] of 1947, an offence under Section 323, penal Code, is cognizable by a Panchayati Adalat within whose jurisdiction it is committed. Section 56 of the Act is : "if at any stage of the proceedings in a criminal case pending before a Magistrate it appears that the case is triable by a Panchayati Adalat, he shall at once transfer that case to the Panchayati adalat which shall try the case de novo. " it is, therefore, clear that the Magistrates concerned should have transferred this case under section 56 of the aforesaid Act to the Panchayati Adalat having jurisdiction over it. They had no choice to go on with the trial of this case.

( 3 ) THE applications which were presented to the Bench Magistrates for the





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top