SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(All) 128

CHANDIRAMANI
BHAJJU LAL – Appellant
Versus
BECHEY SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.P.MISHRA, K.N.Tandon

CHANDIRAMANI, J.

( 1 ) IT appears that one Lalta Singh was owner of a 5 biswas share in zamindari property. He executed a usufructuary mortgage of it on 3rd October 1882, for Rs. 1750 is favour of one gajodhar. On his death the shares in his property devolved as follows : Mt. Rukmin got one biswa, Mt. Chhoti got one biswa, Mt. Mulla got one biswa, Mt. Umrai got one biswa and Durga singh got one biswa.

( 2 ) BECHEY Singh and Khetal Singh bought Mt. Rukmins share. Under Section 12, Agriculturists relief Act, they applied for redemption of this share of her property. This application was-allowed on 24th November 1944, without payment of any mortgage money, The present. applicants, who were the opposite parties in that application under Section 12, Agriculturists relief Act, went up is appeal. The appeal was dismissed. Then they filed the present application in revision. Daring the pendency of this application Khetal Singh, one of the two applicants under Section 12, died on or about 15th August 1948, On 12th September 1949 an application was made for substituting his heirs on the record. This-Court held that there was no sufficient cause for the application for substitution having bee








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top