SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(All) 122

BIND BASNI PRASAD
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Appellant
Versus
BATI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.P.UMYAL, Jagdish Sahay, M.A.KAZI, M.N.Raina

BIND BASNI PRASAD, J.


( 1 ) THIS is a petition by the State of Uttar Pradesh for the amendment of an order passed by this court in Criminal Appeal No. 366 of 1948 on 12th July 1949. The three accused who appeared as opposite party were convicted of offences under Sections 148, 449/149 and 307/149, Penal code, by Shri Mohan Shankar Saksena, Assistant Sessions Judge of Bulandshar, by his judgment, dated 3rd June 1918 and were each sentenced to two years rigorous imprisonment under Section 148, Penal Code, to four years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 100 or in default to one years rigorous imprisonment under Section 449/149, Penal Code, and to six years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 100 or in default to one years rigorous imprisonment under Section 307/149, Penal Code. As regards the substantive sentences of imprisonment he directed that they are to run concurrently. As regards the sentence of imprisonment in default of payment of fine he directed that it will run concurrently but after the expiry of the sentences for the substantive offences.

( 2 ) IN appeal this Court reduced the substantive sentences of imprisonment passed against the opposite parties but in othe










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top