SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(All) 39

N.U.BEG, M.L.CHATURVEDI
BALRAM DAS AGARWAL – Appellant
Versus
KEDAR NATH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
GYAN PRAKASH

N. U. BEG, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a revision application directed against an order of Sri A. S. Srivastava, Civil Judge, gorakhpur impounding a document under Section 33 of Stamp Act.

( 2 ) THE applicant was the defendant in a case pending before the said Court. In that case the applicant filed a document. The Inspector of Stamps made a report that the document was insufficiently stamped, as the document embodied an agreement of partnership. This matter was contested by the applicant; and it was argued before the Court on behalf of the applicant that the document was not an agreement of partnership, but that it was merely a record of a past transaction of partnership, which was termed on his behalf as a memorandum of partnership. The Court went into the arguments of the parties, and decided in favour of the contention advanced on behalf of the Inspector of Stamps. In the alternative, it was argued on behalf of the defendant that the Court could not impound it under Section 33 of the Stamp Act, as the document was not produced before the Court. This contention was also rejected by the trial court. Dissatisfied with the said order, the applicant has filed this revision application.

( 3 ) H







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top