SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(All) 56

V.D.BHARGAVA
SAT NARAIN PANDEY – Appellant
Versus
DHURVA NARAIN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.C.GAUTAM, R.B.Mishra, R.R.PRASAD, SHIV CHARANLAL

V. D. BHARGAVA, J.


( 1 ) THIS is a plaintiffs appeal arising out of a suit for declaration of the plaintiffs right, or in the alternative, for possession over certain zamindari property specified at the foot of the plaint.

( 2 ) ACCORDING to the plaint the plaintiffs father Beni Prasad Pande and Jamna Prasad Pande were real brothers and they were joint. Jamna Prasad died on 23-11-1943, leaving behind him his widow Smt. Ramraji who was defendant No. 2 in the court below and a daughter Smt. Chhabraji, defendant No. 1. Both of them are dead and it is the adopted son of Chhabraji who is respondent in the present case.

( 3 ) THE plaintiffs case was that according to the Hindu Womens Right to Property Act, Smt. Ramraji was only entitled to a widows estate but she surrendered the same in his favour by executing a deed dated 31-1-44 by virture of which the plaintiff said, he became the exclusive owner and was entitled to the declaration, or if he is found to be out of possession, the possession of the plots in dispute. After the deed of surrender the plaintiff applied in the revenue Court for the mutation of his name which was opposed by Smt. Chhabraji, defendant No. 2, and on her oppositi






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top