( 1 ) THESE two connected Special Appeals are directed against one common judgment of the learned Company Judge by which he dismissed two petitions lor winding up of the same company presented by the same petitioners. The first petition was presented on the 22nd of february, 1950 on behalf of two persons appearing as petitioners. The first petitioner was Mohan lal in his personal capacity. The second petitioner was Seth Mohan Lal and Co. , which was a trade name under which Mohan lal was himself carrying on the business, he being the sole proprietor of this firm. The first petition, which was registered as case No. 12 of 1950, was based on certain grounds, which according to the petitioners had come into existence by the 22nd of February, 1950. Subsequently, the petitioners made an application for amendment of this petition. The amendments sought not only included facts relating to incidents before the 22nd of february, 1930 but also certain facts which came into existence after that date, on the basis of which the petitioners wanted to add new grounds for seeking the winding up order. The amendment application was allowed only to the extent that it related to incid