SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(All) 139

B.UPADHYA
BHAGWAN DASS – Appellant
Versus
GANGA PRASAD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.P.SINGH, Shankar Sahai Varma

B. UPADHAYA, J.


( 1 ) THIS is a judgment-debtors appeal arising out of execution proceedings. The decree to he executed was one for costs passed by the High Court in a Civil Revision. The objection taken by the judgment-debtor was that the court of the Munsif bad no jurisdiction to execute the decree, in view of the provisions of Section 38 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The objection was overruled by the executing court and the decision was affirmed in appeal. Learned Counsel has referred me to the provisions of Sections 38 and 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure and relies on a decision of the Calcutta High Court in Durga Charan Banerjee v. Smt. Benodini Devi reported in AIR 1944 cal 301 (1) (A ).

( 2 ) SECTION 38 of the Code of Civil Procedure reads as follows :

"38. A decree may be executed either by the court which passed it or by the court to which it is sent for execution. "

In the preceding Section 37 the expression court which passed a decree has been explained as follows:"37. The expression court which passed a decree or words to that effect shall, in relation to the execution of decrees, unless there is anything repugnant in the subject or context, be deemed to include : (a














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top