SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(All) 186

R.K.CHAUDHARY
PADAM SEN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.BANERJEE, C.S.SARAN, K.C.Agarwala

R. K. CHOWDHARY, J.


( 1 ) THIS is an appeal by Padam Sen and Shekhar Chand of Hilwai within police station Baraut in the district of Meerut against the judgment and order of the learned Special Judge of Meerut sentencing each of them 10 rigorous imprisonment for 1 year and Rs. 500/- fine, with further and months rigorous imprisonment in default of payment of the fine, under Section 165a,. P. C.

( 2 ) SHEKHAR Chand appellants father Genda Mal sued Mithan Lal P. W. 9 and the latters brothers for money on pronotes. The Additional Munsif of Ghaziabad passed judgment on 28-7-1954, holding that the defendants had paid Rs. 7049/10/6 on the pronotes instead of the mere Rs. 4050/- admitted by the plaintiff. The offence for which the appellants have been convicted has been found by the court below to have been committed by the appellants during the pendency of that civil litigation.

( 3 ) APPREHENDING that the plaintiff will fabricate his books of account in order to thwart the defence plea of payment over and above that admitted by the plaintiff, the defendants applied to the Munsif for seizure of the books. The Munsif appointed a lawyer, Sri Raghubir Prasad P. W. 4, Commissioner to seize t




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top