1958 Supreme(All) 177
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
S. S. Dhavan, J.
MOOL BEHARI SAXENA - Appellant
Versus
K.L.GOVIL, REGISTRAR, ACTING VICE-CHANCELLOR, ALLAHABAD UNIVERSITY, - Respondents
Civil Misc. Writ 2679 Of 1958
Decided On : 10/15/1958
C.S.SARAN, G.K.SAHAI, J.Swarup, K.L.MISHRA, P.N.DUDA, R.B.Mishra, S.C.KHARE, VIRENDRA SWARUP
The court will not interfere in the affairs of an autonomous body like the Allahabad University Union unless the petitioner can show that his fundamental rights have been violated.
Headnote:
UNIVERSITY UNION ELECTION - CHALLENGE TO THE VALIDITY OF ELECTION - JURISDICTION OF THE COURT - INTERIM ORDER - RESTRAINING THE ELECTED PRESIDENT FROM FUNCTIONING - PUBLIC INTEREST - AUTONOMOUS FUNCTIONING OF THE UNIVERSITY.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a candidate for the office of President of the Allahabad University Union, challenged the validity of the election of the winning candidate, Sri Satchida Nand Misra, on various grounds. He also sought an interim order restraining Misra from functioning as President during the pendency of the petition.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that it would not be in the public interest to grant the interim order sought by the petitioner. The court reasoned that the Allahabad University Union was an autonomous body capable of dealing with the election dispute and that an interim order would disrupt the Union's functioning.
Issues: 1. Whether the court has jurisdiction to interfere in the affairs of an autonomous body like the Allahabad University Union? 2. Whether an interim order should be granted restraining the elected President from functioning during the pendency of a petition challenging the validity of the election?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that it has jurisdiction to interfere in the affairs of an autonomous body like the Allahabad University Union only if the petitioner can show that his fundamental rights have been violated. 2. The court held that an interim order should not be granted restraining the elected President from functioning during the pendency of a petition challenging the validity of the election unless the petitioner can show that irreparable harm will result if the order is not granted.
Final Decision: The court rejected the petitioner's application for an interim order and directed the parties to bear their own costs.
( 1 ) THIS is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution impugning the legality of the election of Sri Satchida Nand Misra, a student of the University of Allahabad, to the office of the president of the Allahabad University Union. The petitioner Mool Behari Saxena was one of the rival candidates who contested the election and was a close runner-up to the winning candidate, having obtained 1190 votes as against 1221 of Satchida Nand Misra. The election was challenged on a number of grounds which it is not necessary for me to discuss in view of the statement which has been made on behalf of the petitioner to-day. The foundation of the petition was the allegation contained in paragraph 16 of the petitioners affidavit that there had been a great irregularity in the counting of votes, due to the fact that the returning Officer did not take care which he was required to take in the matter of the counting of votes and allowed unauthorised persons to do the counting for him, which was contrary to the provisions of the Constitution of the University Union.
( 2 ) WHEN the case was called up for hearing today Mr. S. C. Khare on behalf of the petitioner made the following statement to the Court which was recorded on his insistence;
"sri Satchida Nand Misra, respondent No. 10, who had been declared elected President of the union of the Allahabad University, has been appointed Assistant Professor in the Gorakhpur university and has joined that post. As such, there is now a vacancy in the office of the President of the Allahabad University Union and this writ petition has become infructuous. It is not pressed. " Another statement was made by Mr. K. L. Misra representing the respondents 1 to 9, which include the Vice-Chancellor, the Dean of the Faculty of Law and Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the aforesaid Union, Mr. J. S. Negi, a member of the Board of Trustees, and professor A. B. Lal, who was the Returning Officer in the election. Mr. Misra stated that, as learned counsel for the petitioner had requested the Court to record the reasons why he was not pressing the petition, the Court might record his statement on behalf of the respondents too. Mr. Misra then stated that if the writ petition had been pressed he would have asked the Court to examine, as at preliminary point, the constitution of the Allahabad University Union and its place and status in the corporate life of the University to decide whether the petitioner had, even on his own uncontroverted allegations, made out any case for the infringement of any right vested in him which could be enforced by this Court under its extraordinary powers under"
Article 226 of the Constitution, he pointed out that the Vice-Chancellor of the University enjoyed, under the constitution of the union itself, overriding powers including the power to suspend the Union. There was no right vested in the petitioner on which a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution could be founded. Mr. Misra however conceded that it was not possible for him to develop and press his points in view of the fact that the petition itself was not being pressed today. Finally he informed the Court that he had been instructed not to press for costs against the petitioner as the various respondents were anxious not to penalise the petitioner financially even if he had been misguided enough to come to this Court and asked for a relief to which he was not entitled,
( 3 ) IN view of Mr. Khares statement on behalf of the petitioner I reject" this petition and direct the parties to bear their own costs. But I am constrained to observe, after having carefully read the petition and the affidavit, that this case should not have been brought to the Court at all. The allahabad University Union is one of several institutions which are an integral part of the allahabad University and whose fundamental object and purpose are to preserve and enrich the corporate life of the University. The essence of corporate