SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(All) 167

B.MUKERJI, S.K.VERMA
BIR BHADRA PRATAP SINGH – Appellant
Versus
D. M. AZAMGARH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.P.UMYAL

B. MUKERJI, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution praying for a writ of habeas corpus or any other appropriate writ or order.

( 2 ) THE circumstances in which this petition arose were these: The petitioner alleged that he was an Advocate of this Court practising at Azamgarh and that the petitioner did some work of a newspaper correspondent in an honorary capacity being a representative of a Hindi Daily named "bharat" which is simultaneously published from Banaras and Allahabad.

( 3 ) THAT on the 2nd of September. 1958, the petitioner had gpne to the courts situate in the compound of the Collectorate, Azamgarh, in connection with his professional work when a procession of the Communist Party reached the compound of the Collectorate shouting slogans and that hearing these slogans the petitioner went to that place: that soon after a lathi charge was made by the police on the processionists who had at the time of the lathi charge collected in front of the Court of the District Magistrate. The petitioner says that he was present there in order to enable him to send news of this incident to the newspaper the honorary representative of which he was. The petitio




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top