IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
J. K. Tandon, J.
JAGDISH NARAIN BHARGAVA - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH - Respondents
Civil Misc. Writ 1120 Of 1957
Decided On : 10/27/1958
REQUISITION OF PROPERTY - U. P. (TEMPORARY) ACCOMMODATION REQUISITION ACT, 1947 - SECTION 3 - REQUISITION ORDER - VALIDITY - CONDITIONS - OPINION OF DISTRICT MAGISTRATE - NECESSITY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSE - DELAY IN FILING PETITION - EXERCISE OF POWER UNDER ARTICLE 226.
Fact of the Case:
The District Magistrate of Agra requisitioned a house under Section 3 of the U. P. (Temporary) Accommodation Requisition Act, 1947, for public purposes without forming an opinion that it was necessary to do so. The owner of the house challenged the requisition order on the grounds that it was illegal and violated his fundamental right to property.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the requisition order was illegal and defective as it failed to comply with one of the essential pre-requisites of Section 3 of the Act, which required the District Magistrate to be of the opinion that it was necessary to requisition the house for a public purpose. The court also held that the delay in filing the petition was not a bar to the exercise of its powers under Article 226, as the fundamental right of property of the petitioner was involved.
Issues: 1. Whether the requisition order was validly made by the District Magistrate? 2. Whether the delay in filing the petition barred the exercise of the court's powers under Article 226?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that the requisition order was illegal and defective as it failed to comply with one of the essential pre-requisites of Section 3 of the Act, which required the District Magistrate to be of the opinion that it was necessary to requisition the house for a public purpose. The court found that the order did not state that the District Magistrate was of such an opinion, and that the fact that the requisition was stated to be for a public purpose alone was not sufficient to satisfy this requirement. 2. The court held that the delay in filing the petition was not a bar to the exercise of its powers under Article 226, as the fundamental right of property of the petitioner was involved. The court noted that the petitioner had been continuously agitating against the validity of the impugned order and had been assured at one time that the property would be released.
Final Decision: The court quashed the requisition order and directed the respondents to restore back the possession of the house to the petitioner within two months. The court also clarified that its order would not prejudice the right, if any, of the District Magistrate to deal with the accommodation under the provisions of the U. P. (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947.
( 1 ) THE facts giving rise to this petition are briefly these:
( 2 ) THE dispute is with respect to house No. 1213 situate at Bagh Muzaffar Khan, Agra, which belonged formerly to one Shri Shadi Ram Loomba, who was an engineer but retired from service sometime prior to 23-7-1953. In July 1953 he went to Bombay, where his son was in service after locking this house. His luggage nevertheless remained in the house. On 23-7-1953 the district Magistrate of Agra, who then was Shri J. M. Raina, requisitioned the said house purporting to act under Section 3 of the U. P. (Temporary) Accommodation Requisition Act, 1947. This section provides that:
"if, in the opinion, of the District Magistrate it is necessary to requisition any accommodation for any public purpose he may, by order in writing, requisition such accommodation and may direct that the possession thereof shall be delivered to him within such period as may be specified in the order. "
One of the provisions in the section further provides that:"no accommodation which is in the actual occupation of any person shall be requisitioned unless the District Magistrate is further of opinion that suitable alternative accommodation exists for his needs or has been provided to him. "
In the present case, admittedly, Shri Loomba was not provided with any alternative accommodation. The order passed by the District Magistrate was as follows:"in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 3 of the U. P. (Temporary) Accommodation requisition Act, 1947 (Act No. XXV of 1947) as amended from time to time and extended upto 30-9-1954,. J. M. Raina, IAS, District Magistrate, Agra, requisition house No. 1213 situate at bagh Muzaffar Khan, Agra, for public purposes and order that within 16 days of the date of service of this order on the occupants of the premises all moveable property of the occupants be removed and the premises handed over to Shri Randhir Singh Magistrate 1st Class. It is further ordered that the owner Shri Shadi Ram Loomba, Retired Engineer, in view of his letter dated 16-6-53 to Shri J. D. Sharma agreeing to let it out on rent does not actually need the accommodation for his own use, also does not need an alternative accommodation in lieu of this house. . . . . . . . . . . . . "
( 3 ) IT does not appear that any notice was sent to Shri Loomba prior to the requisition of the house. After the requisition order had been made the possession of the house was handed over to shri Randhir Singh, Magistrate 1st Class, who then occupied it for his own residence. When Shri loomba came to know of these developments, he applied to the Rent Control and Eviction officer complaining against the said requisition. The matter was referred to the District Magistrate also and ultimately an understanding appeared to have been reached between Shri Loomba, on the one hand, and the District Magistrate on the other, wherefore Shri Loomba did not press his application and the District Magistrate in his turn approved that the house would be released from requisition upon Shri Randhir Singhs transfer from Agra. Shri Loomba sold the house to the petitioner and according to the latter he also authorised him to act on his behalf in all matters ancillary to de-requisition of the house.
( 4 ) THE trouble arose once again after the transfer of Shri Randhir Singh when, contrary to the understanding given by the District Magistrate on 13-5-1954 for the release of the house on Shri randhir Singhs transfer, it was occupied by one Shri D. D. Mahey, a Judicial Officer. On 30-5-1956 the present petitioner again applied to the District Magistrate asking for the de-requisitioning of the house but at the same time giving his consent to Shri Mahey to continue in the house so long as he remained in Agra. This application was recommended by the Rent control and Eviction Officer to the District Magistrate to effect the de-requisition of the house but the District Magistrate did not approve it on 2-9-1956 by the follo
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.