IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
B. Mukerji and H. P. Asthana, JJ.
RAM HAZOOR PANDEY - Appellant
Versus
STATE - Respondents
Criminal Appeal 1383 Of 1958
Decided On : 11/14/1958
CRIMINAL LAW - EVIDENCE - CHILD WITNESSES - COMPETENCY AND CREDIBILITY - CORROBORATION - SECTION 118 OF THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT - INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION - FACTUAL CIRCUMSTANCES - UNRELIABILITY OF CHILD WITNESSES' TESTIMONY - LACK OF INDEPENDENT CORROBORATION - DOUBTFUL MOTIVE - INCONCLUSIVE MEDICAL EVIDENCE - APPEAL ALLOWED, CONVICTION AND SENTENCE SET ASIDE.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant, Ram Hazoor, was convicted by the Sessions Judge of Gorakhpur under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to death for the murder of Hardwar Pande. The prosecution alleged that Ram Hazoor had killed Hardwar Pande by attacking him with a gandasa on the night between the 6th and 7th of November, 1957. The motive for the crime was said to have been a subsisting enmity between Ram Hazoor and Hardwar Pande.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the prosecution had failed to prove the case against the appellant beyond reasonable doubt. The court found that the testimony of the two child witnesses, Markande and Kripa Shanker, who were the alleged eyewitnesses to the murder, was unreliable and could not be relied upon. The court also found that the other evidence adduced by the prosecution, including the testimony of Srimati Sumitra, Srimati Anari, Santokhi, and Jaleshar Ram, was not sufficient to corroborate the testimony of the child witnesses.
Issues: 1. Whether the testimony of the child witnesses, Markande and Kripa Shanker, was reliable and could be relied upon. 2. Whether the other evidence adduced by the prosecution was sufficient to corroborate the testimony of the child witnesses. 3. Whether the motive for the crime, as alleged by the prosecution, was established.
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that the testimony of the child witnesses, Markande and Kripa Shanker, was unreliable and could not be relied upon. The court noted that the trial judge had failed to conduct a preliminary examination of the child witnesses to assess their mental capacity and understanding of the significance of the oath. The court also noted that the child witnesses' testimony was inconsistent and lacked corroboration from other evidence. 2. The court held that the other evidence adduced by the prosecution, including the testimony of Srimati Sumitra, Srimati Anari, Santokhi, and Jaleshar Ram, was not sufficient to corroborate the testimony of the child witnesses. The court found that the testimony of Srimati Sumitra and Srimati Anari was unreliable and that the testimony of Santokhi and Jaleshar Ram was incredible. 3. The court held that the motive for the crime, as alleged by the prosecution, was not established. The court noted that the evidence of enmity between Ram Hazoor and Hardwar Pande was weak and that there was no evidence to suggest that Ram Hazoor had any reason to kill Hardwar Pande.
Final Decision: The court allowed the appeal, set aside the conviction and sentence of the appellant, and directed that he be set at liberty forthwith unless required for some other offence. The reference by the trial judge for the confirmation of the sentence of death was accordingly rejected.
( 1 ) THIS is an appeal by Ram Hazoor who has been convicted by the learned Sessions Judge of gorakhpur under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to death. Along with the appeal there is also a reference by the learned Judge for the confirmation of the sentence of death.
( 2 ) ACCORDING to the prosecution case, Ram Hazoor, a young man of 19 years, is alleged to have killed one of his collaterals, namely, Hardwar Pande, by attacking him with a gandasa on the night between the 6th and the 7th of November, 1957, when Hardwar Pande was sleeping in his osara along with his two grand-children, Markande, aged between 8 and 9, and Sadho alias Kripa shanker, aged between 7 and 8 years. The motive for the crime was said to have been a subsisting enmity between Ram Hazoor and Hardwar Pande: this enmity is said to have been accentuated by an incident that took place during the Panchayat elections when the accused is alleged to have beaten the deceased and in respect of which beating the deceased filed a complaint before the Panchayati Adalat. This complaint was pending at the date when Hardwar Pande was murdered. According to the prosecution case, the assault on Hardwar Pande was made in the small hours of the morning between 3 and 4 Oclock on the 7th November, 1957. The assault was alleged to have been actually witnessed by Markande and Kripa Shanker, the two grandchildren, who, as we have already noticed earlier, were sleeping alongside the deceased, Markande, it was said, slept on the same bed on which slept Hardwar Pande, while Kripa Shanker, the other grandson, slept on a bench which was adjacent to Hardwar Pandes bed. At the time when the actual assault was made nobody save the two aforementioned individuals woke up or witnessed the assault. Two witnesses, Srimati Anari and Santokhi, are alleged to have seen the assailant running away from the scene of occurrence after the crime with a gandasa in his hand. Srimati Sumitra, the mother of Markande and the aunt of Kripa Shanker, is alleged to have come out on the cries of the two young lads and to have seen Hardwar Pande lying dead and to have learnt from the two young boys the fact that Hardwar Pande had been assaulted by ram Hazoor, the appellant, with a gandasa. Jagarnath, deceaseds cousin some degrees removed, who lived in a house some 20 paces to the south of the house of the deceased, also arrived on hearing the cries emanating from Hardwar Pandes house: he also gathered the fact that the murder had been witnessed by Markande and Kripa Shanker.
( 3 ) JAGARNATH thereafter went to police station Bansgaon, which was two miles away from Saintal, the village of incident, and there he made a first information report at 5. 30 in the morning. This is what Jagarnath said in his report which he scribed himself and which he handed over at police station Bansgaon :
"i beg to say that my cousin brother Hardwar Pande, son of Deo Narain Pande, resident o saintal, P. S. Bansgaon, was sleeping last night in the osara at his door. His grandson, Markande, aged 10 years, was sleeping on his charpoy and another grandson of his, Sadho, aged 9 years was sleeping on a Bench by his side. I was sleeping at my house. At about 3 or 4 Oclock when I heard the sound of weeping and wailing of women, I went running to his door and saw the throat of Hardwar Pande cut and him lying dead on the charpoy. There is a good deal of blood and blood stains on the face and Kurta of Markande and the wall and the bed on which Hardwar Pande had been sleeping. Markande who was sleeping with him disclosed that he woke up on hearing a dog-bark, that Ram Hazoor Pande who belonged to his village had struck his grandfather on the throat with a gandasa, that man who was in his company was standing under the osara, that he could identify him if confronted, and that he had remained lying quietly out of fear. Litigation has long been going on and there was old enmity between Ram Hazoor Pande and Hardwar Pan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.